@Marc Clayton You have completely misconstrued anything for which I stand or believe. Do not jump to conclusions. And do not truck with ad hominems. I am not your enemy. Who is "you"?

@Marc Clayton Thanks. The mind map would have helped me long ago when I first asked for a link to the original constitution a couple of months ago. Now I can at least place it side by side with the fake constitution and compare. Yeah, nah, it's not as simple as a side-by-side comparison, and the first thing you went for was to download the David Walter document << not the best start... May I suggest going through the meetings and listening to how everything fits together - there's a much deeper comprehension happening than just a side-by-side comparison of two things... Who knows, watching the meetings may also reveal to you what a "nice person" is too... Many, many layers plus years, and years of comprehension go into what Stephen and co reveal and could take quite some deprogramming on your part, Marc.

@Marc Clayton, again, you sound like a really nice person. I don't know you but in black and white on the page here, you're confused and confusing: Marc Clayton says: Words matter, and I have none. I just deleted an answer of about 700 words. People are trying to help you here, however, you're just not getting it... When you think you already know it all, you close yourself off from learning new stuff. Yes, words do matter! Satanists manipulating the mainstream mindset are word geeks, they eat, breathe, drink, and excrete every s/word/s (spelling) and piece of symbolism they can muster to try and trick us with their doublespeak. You're using doublespeak as well but in a different form from the Satanists. Don't think you're evil per se, but you're probably very easily led by the dark cabal into producing more evil for them as you don't (yet) know who you are, or what you're not. It's plain to see you have very new eyes with this sort of stuff (you're still operating with the mainstream programming you've been raised with your whole life) and instead of engaging with Stephen on a logical playing field (masculine), you've returned with yet another emotional field of energy (feminine). The mainstream programming is stronger the older we get so, as we age, more effort is required to listen (and HEAR!) those in the know who actually have good intentions for you. Instead of being a product of the Satanist's base programming with your decision-making process, why not listen, hear, and speak with Stephen on the subject matter itself? Because while you're continually knee-jerking (off), reacting with emotion and ego, instead of going away to learn before coming back with pertinent questions, you'll just keep going around in circles. The quality of the question determines the quality of the answer but you're unable to ask those quality questions while you're here typing with your self-confessed limited knowledge in this field... Here's a mindmap Stephen worked on which may assist in a higher level of comprehension for you: https://mm.tt/map/2221497804?t=LM2JF0wiFy

@Marc Clayton Likewise, Marc Clayton, I have little-to-no idea who you are. Can only go by what you're saying in black and white here on the page and I'm betting you don't quite know who you are, or what you're not, either. Your lip service sounds very familiar, have heard the likes of your pitter-patter before... On the surface, to untrained ears and eyes, you appear to know what you're talking about but, in reality, you're a time/energy vampire... and your words via this constant knee-jerk defence of the ego and your justifications make you look either intentionally delusive, schizophrenic, or stupid. Needless to say, you're probably a nice person, am leaning towards the latter because that old saying comes to mind: "Stupid doesn't know it's stupid" (and a little "knowledge" can be dangerous!) You're probably not stupid in all areas of life, however, in this court where Stephen's knowledge simply reigns supreme over yours, it's laughable to compare yourself to him, it truly is... Sure, we're all equally connected to our Creator (so we're all equal by those means) but this isn't what I'm saying here; sparse knowing in the bigger picture can be dangerous. Stephen has done way more leg work than the average bear but, by the sounds of it, you haven't even grazed a knee in the right areas so it would be prudent to sit back quietly and listen when Stephen is speaking instead of the constant jibber-jabber/defence mechanisms and justifications kicking in. It takes years and years to reveal the many complex layers of this arena, and based upon the words and contradictions you're using/saying, it's clear to see you've not spent your many years looking into even an inkling of what Stephen inherently knows through not only deep research but also firsthand knowledge... It often takes those years of other experiences to piece together what Stephen's up to now with Dick Yardley and Stephen's doing a great service to everyone by taking the time to interview Dick every week, twice a week. You've flip-flopped around quite a lot in this thread, Marc, but going back to an earlier thing you said about Stephen proving himself to you... Stephen doesn't need to prove anything to anyone... It's up to others to use their nous to determine their own truth for themselves about everything and everyone... and even then, everyone's own "truth" is purely subjective due to our unique perceptions... To be more accurate, when people are talking, we should say "my truth" and not "the truth". Instead of more ego trips and justifications, perhaps go away and come back again once you've done some actual digging or have some skin in this particular game... Or not... It's up to you... You could keep digging that hole deeper here if you want, you're a "nice person" after all and surely can't ever be wrong... and (when not busy) this is actually a little entertaining seeing what lip service rubbish you're going to produce next :D

@Marc, yes, con artists get away with their scams by gaining people's respect and being "believable", etc. They wouldn't be able to pull the wool over the eyes of the incompetent with lies alone. If they didn't mix in some semblance of "truth" with their outright deception, how would they be able to get away with their scam? We can't be duped when we see through the con. When someone isn't yet skilled enough to realise the real lies with real eyes, guys like Stephen then have to step up, step in, and shed light on things so 'the fooled' don't perpetuate the corrupted by "sharing" (promoting!) damaging links. Yes, you did promote as your words certainly didn't demote the site. Most people I know are 'justification machines', we're all experts with validating things (even when things aren't good for us), but not all of us are consciously aware of trying to rationalise such things - especially the unjustifiable... The longer we continue to do such an act instead of taking it on the chin and accepting the fact there are others are out there trying to warn and defend against those con artists so they don't force harm on any more people in the future, the longer we're wheel-spinning in the mud. Instead of jumping straight into defence mode, perhaps take a minute or two to really contemplate... Perhaps read (between the lines of) a couple of times, whilst trying to really see where Stephen is coming from, and his good intentions with helping/supporting others in these early stages of doing themselves a mischief. By associating oneself with the sharing of a link attached to an absolute creatin, derelict, and pure scum of the Earth in a public forum, it's not looking favourably for ones' own reputation - but to then poo-poo Stephen, when he's trying to help see through something people are clearly unaware of, let's just say it's tough to watch people shrug that off and jump straight into knee-jerk defence mode. Strong emotion = 'strong change' and that can be a good thing, however, instead of another emotional reaction where bruised ego is attempting to defend its puppets actions (we are not our ego, just like a builder isn't their hammer), perhaps look more towards the logic of what Stephen's trying to get through, maybe?

Oh my goodness, Marc Clayton, do you realise who you're promoting? May I suggest digging into who Mike Holt is and who he's associated with. You may change your mind after looking a little deeper.